Document Type : Original Research Paper

Author

PhD Student, Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Technical and Engineering, Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: One of the major challenges in the insurance industry is combating fraud during the claim submission process, which is particularly evident in digital claim systems where customers send images of damages and injuries through mobile applications. As the insurance sector continues its digital transformation, introducing modern methods across various operational stages such as underwriting, issuance, and claim processing, the necessity of developing innovative and secure fraud detection mechanisms has become more crucial than ever. With the rapid digitization and digitalization of insurance services, ensuring the authenticity of transmitted data and protecting sensitive information have emerged as key priorities. In digital claim reporting, where policyholders upload damage photographs via mobile applications, the authenticity of spatial and temporal metadata—specifically the location and time of the captured images—plays a vital role in reducing fraudulent submissions. To address this issue, this study proposes a novel security framework that utilizes steganography and cryptography for embedding encrypted metadata directly into the image file. In this method, the location and timestamp information extracted from the damage images are first encrypted using the AES-GCM algorithm and then securely embedded into the image through a Generative Adversarial Network (GAN)-based steganographic model. The hidden data can subsequently be extracted and decrypted at the insurer’s end for verification. This approach not only strengthens the authenticity verification of the submitted images but also enhances data confidentiality and resistance to tampering. By integrating this method into a company’s insurance application, insurers can build greater trust with policyholders, automate the verification process, and effectively reduce costs associated with fraudulent activities. The combination of deep learning–based steganography with robust encryption offers a promising path toward intelligent, secure, and fraud-resistant insurance claim systems.
METHODS: The proposed system employs a GAN-based steganographic framework to embed spatial and temporal metadata within damage images. Initially, the Exif metadata (including the capture time and GPS coordinates) is extracted and encrypted using the AES-GCM (Advanced Encryption Standard – Galois/Counter Mode) algorithm. This encryption stage ensures confidentiality and integrity of sensitive data before it is hidden in the image. The encrypted data are then embedded using a deep neural network generator, which learns to conceal information within the least perceptible image regions while preserving high visual fidelity. For performance evaluation, the system was tested on a dataset of 100 automobile damage photographs having been collected from real insurance claim records. Three methods were compared: Baseline LSB (Least Significant Bit) method, GAN-based steganography without encryption, and GAN combined with AES-GCM encryption (proposed method). The evaluation considered several quantitative metrics: Image quality measured by Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) and Structural Similarity Index (SSIM), Embedding capacity, Bit Error Rate (BER) under standard steganalysis attacks such as JPEG compression (quality 50), Gaussian noise (σ = 5), and image scaling (0.9), and Detection rate of metadata manipulation to assess system robustness against tampering.
FINDINGS: The experimental results confirmed the effectiveness of the proposed approach. Images containing hidden data maintained a high visual quality with an average PSNR of 41 dB, demonstrating that the steganographic embedding had minimal perceptual impact. The GAN-based method outperformed the baseline LSB technique, achieving higher image quality (40.6 ± 0.8 dB vs. 36.7 ± 1.1 dB) and better structural similarity. Moreover, the average BER under compression and noise attacks was nearly half that of the baseline method (≈12–19% vs. ≈29–34%). Integrating AES-GCM encryption had no negative effect on visual quality but significantly improved end-to-end data security. Statistical analysis using a paired-sample t-test revealed that the performance differences were significant at a 95% confidence level (p < 0.001). The 95% confidence interval for PSNR values of the proposed model was calculated to be [40.7, 41.3], reflecting the system’s stability and consistency. In the metadata tampering experiments, all instances of manipulated metadata in the 100-image dataset were successfully detected, achieving 100% detection accuracy. The average mobile implementation time for the complete encryption and embedding sequence was approximately 2.0 seconds per image, confirming the feasibility of applying the system in real-time insurance applications
CONCLUSION: The findings of this research demonstrate that employing deep learning-based steganography (GAN) in combination with AES-GCM encryption can effectively mitigate security challenges in online insurance claim processes. The proposed method provides a reliable mechanism to verify the authenticity of spatial and temporal data while maintaining high image quality and computational efficiency. This integrated framework enhances both data protection and fraud prevention, ensuring that insurance companies can verify the legitimacy of submitted claim images with greater confidence. Consequently, the proposed GAN–AES hybrid model achieves an optimal balance between image fidelity, robustness to steganographic attacks, and metadata integrity verification. The results suggest that this approach can serve as a practical and efficient layer of protection for digital insurance claim systems, contributing to enhancing trust, transparency, and security across the insurance ecosystem.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Abdollahi, B., Harati, A., & Taherinia, A. (2023). A review of content adaptive image steganography methods. Signal and Data Processing Quarterly, 20(3), 141–182. https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/2214150 [In Persian].
Aberoomand, N., Momen Bahador, F., & Bagheri Najjavanloo, B. (2015). Improving LSB-based steganography using multi-objective genetic algorithm [Conference Presentation]. The Second International Conference and the Third National Conference on the Application of New Technologies in Engineering Sciences. https://civilica.com/doc/501720/ [In Persian].
Afsoorde, H., & Dadvar, M. (2015). Image steganography combined with cryptography and compression based on MLP neural networks [Conference Presentation]. International Conference on Novel Research Findings in Electrical and Computer Engineering. https://civilica.com/doc/404648 [In Persian].
Ahmadlou, Y., Pourebrahimi, A., Tanha, J., & Rajabzadeh, A. (2023). Presenting a hybrid model for identifying claims of suspicious damages in agricultural insurance. Iranian Journal of Insurance Research12(1), 63-78. https://doi.org/10.22056/ijir.2023.01.06 [In Persian].
Dalal, M., & Juneja, M. (2021). Steganography and steganalysis (in digital forensics): A cybersecurity guide. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 80(4), 5723–5771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09929-9
Ghoul, S., Sulaiman, R., & Shukur, Z. (2023). A review on security techniques in image steganography. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 14(6), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2023.0140640
Gomathi, S., & Radhika, C. (2025). A secure messaging application using steganography and AES encryption: A dual-layer secure messaging system. The Scientific Temper, 16(2), 3803–3811. https://doi.org/10.58414/SCIENTIFICTEMPER.2025.16.2.12
Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., & Bengio, Y. (2014). Generative Adversarial Nets [Conference Presentation]. NIPS'14: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (Vol. 2, pp. 2672 - 2680).  https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2969033.2969125
Hassani Azhdari, M., Mahmoodzadeh, A., Khishe, M., & Rezaii, M. A. (2021). Digital image watermarking using the combination of genetic algorithm and spread spectrum method in the field of discrete cosine transform. Iranian Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 25(1), 14-33. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijmst.2021.39044 [In Persian].
Jaybhaye, S., Doshi, H., Dudul, A., Gaikwad, N., & Hole, P. (2023). Secure message transmission: Integrating AES encryption and LSB substitution steganography in a Django-based system. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 11(12), 198–205. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2023.57282
Kadhim, I. J., Premaratne, P., Vial, P. J., & Halloran, B. (2019). Comprehensive survey of image steganography: Techniques, evaluations, and trends in future research. Neurocomputing, 335, 299–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2018.06.075
Kim, K., Choi, S., Kwon, H., Kim, H., Liu, Z., & Seo, H. (2020). PAGE—practical AES GCM encryption for low end microcontrollers. Applied Sciences, 10(9), 3131. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10093131
Knöchel, M., & Karius, S. (2024). Text steganography methods and their influence in malware: A comprehensive overview and evaluation [Conference presentation]. Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Workshop on Information Hiding and Multimedia Security. https://doi.org/10.1145/3658664.3659637
Kumari, G., & Indra, G. (2024). Video steganography with deep learning [Conference presentation]. International Conference on Innovative Computing & Communication -ICICC 2024.  https://ssrn.com/abstract=4814247
Mandal, P. C., Mukherjee, I., Paul, G., & Chatterji, B. N. (2022). Digital image steganography: A literature survey. Information Sciences, 609, 1451–1488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.07.120
Subramanian, N., Elharrouss, O., Al Maadeed, S., & Bouridane, A. (2021). Image steganography: A review of the recent advances. IEEE Access, 9, 23409-23423. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3053998
Nezami, Z. I., Ali, H., Asif, M., Aljuaid, H., Hamid, I., & Ali, Z. (2022). An efficient and secure technique for image steganography using a hash function. PeerJ Computer Science, 8, e1157, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1157
Norouzi, E. (2025). A robust steganography framework for securing sensitive remote data using convolutional neural networks. Journal of Science and Engineering Elites, 10(2), 142-149. https://elitesjournal.com/fa/page.php?rid=963 [In Persian].
Paul, T., Ghosh, S., & Majumder, A. (2022). A study and review on image steganography. In S. Smys, R. Bestak, R. Palanisamy, & I. Kotuliak (Eds.), Computer Networks and Inventive Communication Technologies. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies (Vol. 75, pp. 523-531). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3728-5_40
Rahman, S., Masood, F., Ullah Khan, W., Ullah, N., Qudus Khan, F., Tsaramirsis, G., Jan, S., & Ashraf, M. (2020). A novel approach of image steganography for secure communication based on LSB substitution technique. Computers, Materials & Continua, 64(1), 31–61. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2020.09186
Singh, S., Singh, R., & Siddiqui, T. J. (2016). Singular value decomposition based image steganography using integer wavelet transform. In S. M. Thampi, S. Bandyopadhyay, S. Krishnan, K.-C. Li, S. Mosin, & M. Ma (Eds.), Advances in Signal Processing and Intelligent Recognition Systems. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 425, pp. 593-601.( Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28658-7_50
Sokhanvar, A., & Babaei, P. (2016). Application of fuzzy neural networks, genetic algorithms, and least significant bit in image steganography [Conference Presentation]. Proceedings of the First National Conference on Technology in Applied Engineering (NCTAE2016), Young Researchers and Elites Club, Islamic Azad University, Tehran West Branch. https://www.sid.ir/fileserver/sf/8071395h0134.pdf [In Persian].
Tushara, M., & Navas, K. A. (2016). Image steganography using discrete wavelet transform– A review. International Journal of Innovative Research in Electrical, Electronics, Instrumentation and Control Engineering, 3(1s), 207–212.  https://ijireeice.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/nCORETech-38.pdf
Venkat Sudheer, P., Harini, M., & Jayachandra, G. (2025). GAN powered image steganography: Combining NLP and generative adversarial networks for text and voice encryption. International Journal of Science and Advanced Technology (IJSAT), 16(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/g9r8fj
Viaene, S., & Dedene, G. (2004). Insurance fraud: Issues and challenges. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, 29(2), 313–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0440.2004.00290.x
Kim, H., & Seo, H. (2025). Optimizing AES-GCM on 32-Bit ARM Cortex-M4 Microcontrollers: Fixslicing and FACE-based approach. ACM Transaction on Embedded Computing Systems, 24(6), 1-24.  https://doi.org/10.1145/3766074
 
Khan, N., Haan, R., Boktor, G., McComas, M., & Daneshi, R. (2020). Steganography GAN: Cracking steganography with cycle generative adversarial networks. arXiv:2006.04008. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2006.04008
Klemm, R., & Chen, B. (2024). Hiding sensitive information using PDF steganography .arXiv:2405.00865. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.00865
Zhang, K. A., Cuesta Infante, A., Xu, L., & Veeramachaneni, K. (2019). SteganoGAN: High-capacity image steganography with GANs. arXiv:1901.03892. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1901.03892

Letters to Editor


IJIR Journal welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in IJIR should be sent to the editorial office of IJIR within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.

[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.
CAPTCHA Image