Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

Department of Public Administration, Islamic Azad University, Ghaem Shahr Branch, Mazandaran, Iran

Abstract

Objective: This research was conducted with the aim of identifying the factors of optimal corporate governance in the Iranian insurance company and prioritizing them using the TOPSIS fuzzy method.
Methodology: The present research was descriptive-survey based on the mixed method in terms of practical purpose and in terms of data collection. In identifying the factors, the theme analysis method was used and in prioritizing the components, the fuzzy TOPSIS method was used. The community of experts in the qualitative phase included 15 Iranian insurance managers and the statistical sample included 152 people in the quantitative phase. Semi-structured interviews and questionnaires were also used as data collection tools.
Findings: The research model was obtained in the form of 5 optional codes, 12 core codes and 74 sub-themes using the Delphi method from the consensus of experts. In surveying the research model, the components were ranked based on value weights. The results showed that the component of separation of the role of the chairman of the board of directors and the CEO had the highest value weight and the component of the selected employee representative had the lowest value weight among 74 indicators.
Conclusion: Corporate governance is an optimal tool to protect the rights of shareholders and beneficiaries in the insurance industry.

Keywords

آذر، عادل و رجب‌زاده، علی. (1396). تصمیم‌گیری کاربردی (رویکرد MADM). تهران: انتشارت نگاه دانش، چاپ هفتم.
بنویدی، مجید. (1390). لزوم برقراری حاکمیت شرکتی در صنعت بیمه. ‌هجدهمین همایش ملی و چهارمین همایش بین‌المللی بیمه و توسعه‌، تهران: پژوهشکده بیمه، 8 آذرماه 1390.
پاک مرام‌، عسگر و لطفی، بهرام. (1397). ارتباط حاکمیت شرکتی با عملکرد مالی و ریسک شرکت‌های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. پژوهشنامه بیمه، ‌‌31(4): 48-25.
پورسید، بهزاد.، حسینی، سیدمحمدرضا و سهرابی، لیلا. (1395). راهکارهای بهبود نظام حاکمیت شرکتی ایران با تأکید بر شاخص حمایت از سهامداران خرد بانک جهانی. پژوهشنامه بازرگانی، 21(81): 96-57. ‌
‌حجازی، رضوان و مختاری‌نژاد، حمید‌رضا. (1396). رابطه ساختار حاکمیت شر‌کتی با احتمال گزارشگری مالی متقلبانه. ‌حسابداری ارزشی و رفتاری، 7(1): 77-55. ‌
حمیدیان، محسن.، نعمتی کشتلی، رضا و مدنی، سیدمجتبی. (1395). بررسی وضعیت حاکمیت شرکتی در شرکت‌های دولتی پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. چهارمین کنفرانس بین‌المللی مدیریت استراتژیک‌، تهران، دانشکده مدیریت دانشگاه تهران، 16 آذرماه. 
شورورزی، محمدرضا.، خلیلی، محسن.، سلیمانی، حمید و فروتن، امید. (1394). ارتباط بین حاکمیت شرکتی و عملکرد شرکت بر مبنای رگرسیون فازی. پژوهش‌های حسابداری مالی و حسابرسی، ‌1(32): 139-121.
عالم تبریز، اکبر.، رجبی ‌پورمیبدی، علیرضا و زارعیان، محمد. (1388). بررسی کارکرد تاپسیس فازی در بهبود سنجش کارایی شعب بانک­ها با استفاده از تکنیک ‌DEA. ‌مدیریت صنعتی، 1(3): 118-99.
قلی پور، رحمت‌الله.، مشایخی، بیتا‌ و ناصری، امین. (‌1395‌). حاکمیت شر‌کتی در بخش عمومی و نقش آن در اقتصاد مقاومتی. سیاست‌های مالی و اقتصادی، ‌14(4): 130-107.
‌کاویانی، میثم.، حمیدیان، محسن و بوستانی، سارا. (1397). بررسی تأثیر حاکمیت شرکتی بر کارایی صنعت بیمه. پژوهشنامه بیمه، ‌33(3): 40-23.
ناصری، امین. (1395). طراحی چارچوب حاکمیت شرکتی خوب در بنگاه های اقتصادی بخش عمومی. رساله دکترای تخصصی مدیریت تکنولوژی، دانشکده مدیریت دانشگاه تهران.
 
‌Brown, L. & ‌Claylor, M. (2009). Corporate governance and firm performance. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 32(2): 129-144
Boubakri, N., Cosset, J. C. & Guedhami, O. (2003). Postprivatization corporate governance: The role of ownership structure and investor protection. Journal of Financial Economics, 76(2): 369-399.
‌Black, B. S., Jang, H. & Kim, W. (2006). Does corporate governance predict firms' market values? evidence from Korea. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 22(2): 366-413.
‌Dalton, D. & Dalton, C. M .(2011). Trips and tips for negotiation self-defense: Forewarned is forearmed. Business Horizons, 54(1): 63-72.
‌Erickson, J., Park,Y., Reising, J. &  Shin, H. (2005). Board composition and firm value under concentrated ownership: the Canadian evidence. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 13(4): 387-410.
Fama, E. F. & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(3): 301- 325.
Filatotchev, I., & Poulsen, A. & Bell, R. G. (2019). Corporate governance of a multinational enterprise: Firm, industry and institutional perspectives. Journal of Corporate Finance, 57(C): 1-8.
‌Haniffa, R. & Hudaib, M .(2006). Corporate governance structure and performance of Malaysian listed companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(7-8): 1034-1062.
Hsu, W.Y. & Petchsakulwong, P. (2010). The impact of corporate governance on the efficiency performance of the Thai non-life insurance industry. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice, 35(1): S28-S49.
Hashi, I. (2004). The legal framework for effective corporate governance: Comparative analysis of provisions on selected transition economies. CASE Network Studies and Analyses 0268, CASE-Center for Social and Economic Research.
‌Jiraporn, P., ‌Chatjuthamard, P., & Tong, S. & Kim, Y. S. (2015). Does corporate governance influence corporate risk-taking? Evidence from the Institutional Shareholders Services (ISS). Finance Research Letters, 13(C): ‌105-112.
‌Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The worldwide governance indicators : Methodology and analytical issues. Policy Research working paper ; no. WPS 5430. World Bank.
Muth, M. & Donaldson, L .(1998). Stewardship theory and board structure: A contingency approach. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 6(1): 5-28 .
Osborne, S. P. (2006). The new public governance. Public Management Review, 8(3): 377-387.
‌Sanda, A., Mikailu, A. S. & Garba, T. ‌(2010). Corporate governance mechanisms and firm financial performance in Nigeria. Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, 2(1): 22-39.
‌Tang, H. W., Chen, A., & Chang, C. C. (2013). Insider trading, accrual abuse, and corporate governance in emerging markets - Evidence from Taiwan. Pac Basin Finance, 24(C): 132–155.

Letters to Editor


IJIR Journal welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in IJIR should be sent to the editorial office of IJIR within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.

[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.
CAPTCHA Image