Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D., Department of Accounting, Faculty of Finance and Accounting, Iranian eUniversity, Tehran, Iran.

2 PhD Student, Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Master's degree, Department of Management, Faculty of Management, Science and Technology, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The financial solvency and sustainability of insurance companies is widely recognized as a fundamental cornerstone of financial system stability, given the central role insurers play in risk transfer, loss absorption, and long-term capital allocation. Solvent insurance institutions contribute to economic resilience by protecting policyholders, limiting contagion effects, and reinforcing trust in financial markets. International experience, particularly during episodes of financial disstress and insurance market disruptions, has shown that weaknesses in insurers’ financial soundness can propagate systemic risk, amplify macroeconomic shocks, and undermine the effectiveness of regulatory frameworks. As a result, supervisory authorities increasingly emphasize the development of early-warning mechanisms and analytical tools capable of monitoring and forecasting insurers’ financial conditions in a timely and reliable manner. In this context, identifying the determinants of insurers’ financial solvency and constructing empirically robust predictive models have become key research priorities. While several internationally recognized frameworks—such as Risk-Based Capital Systems, Solvency II, and Financial Soundness Indicators—have been developed and applied across advanced insurance markets, their empirical adaptation to emerging and developing insurance systems remains limited. In Iran, despite the expansion of the insurance industry, increased private sector participation, and greater product complexity, empirical studies that integrate global solvency frameworks with firm-level domestic data are still relatively scarce. Accordingly, the primary objective of this study is to identify the key financial factors influencing the solvency of Iranian insurance companies and to develop an analytical model for predicting their financial condition based on internationally accepted financial soundness frameworks.
METHODS: This study adopts a quantitative approach grounded in established international solvency assessment methodologies. A comprehensive set of indicators was constructed using the CARAMELS framework and Financial Soundness Indicators (FSIs), capturing critical dimensions of insurers’ financial health, including capital adequacy, asset quality, reinsurance structure, actuarial soundness, management efficiency, profitability, liquidity, and sensitivity to risk. Financial data were extracted from the audited financial statements of Iranian insurance companies over the study period and subjected to rigorous preprocessing procedures, including data validation, standardization, normality assessment, and the mitigation of multicollinearity among explanatory variables. Given the binary nature of the dependent variable indicating improvement or deterioration in financial solvency, a logistic regression model was employed to estimate the probability of maintaining adequate solvency. Model parameters were estimated using maximum likelihood techniques, and model adequacy was evaluated through standard goodness-of-fit measures and classification performance indicators. To assess the robustness and stability of the estimated relationships, a sensitivity analysis was conducted by examining changes in coefficient estimates and predictive outcomes under alternative specifications. This methodological design allows both explanatory insight into solvency drivers and practical predictive capability for supervisory use.
FINDINGS: The empirical results indicate that the estimated model demonstrates a strong predictive performance and satisfactory explanatory power. The final specification achieves an overall prediction accuracy of 84 percent, with a Pseudo R² value of 0.42, suggesting a substantial improvement over baseline models and confirming the relevance of the selected financial soundness indicators. Capital adequacy variables exhibit a positive and statistically significant relationship with financial solvency, highlighting the importance of strong equity positions and sufficient capital buffers in enhancing insurers’ resilience. Profitability measures, particularly return on assets (ROA), also show a significant positive effect on solvency, reflecting the role of efficient asset utilization and sustainable earnings generation in supporting long-term financial stability. Liquidity-related indicators similarly exert a positive influence, underscoring the importance of maintaining adequate liquid resources to meet short-term obligations and absorb unexpected shocks. In contrast, variables associated with insurance risk exposures such as outstanding claims reserves and policyholder-related liabilities demonstrate statistically significant negative effects on solvency. These results suggest that excessive reserve burdens and growing insurance liabilities can materially weaken insurers’ financial positions if not properly managed. The sensitivity analysis confirms the stability of the estimated coefficients, as both the direction and relative magnitude of key effects remain consistent across alternative model specifications.
CONCLUSION: The findings of this study indicate that capital strength, profitability, and effective liquidity management are central determinants of financial solvency in the Iranian insurance industry, while insufficient control of insurance-related liabilities poses a significant risk to financial stability. By integrating internationally recognized financial soundness frameworks with localized firm-level data, this research provides a practical and analytically robust model for monitoring and forecasting insurers’ financial conditions. The proposed approach offers valuable implications for regulatory authorities seeking to strengthen early-warning systems, for insurance company managers engaged in strategic financial planning, and for policymakers aiming to enhance the resilience and stability of the national insurance system. Overall, the study demonstrates that internationally established solvency assessment frameworks can be effectively adapted to emerging insurance markets when combined with appropriate econometric techniques and context-specific data. The results provide a solid empirical foundation for future research and for the development of more advanced, data-driven solvency monitoring tools in the insurance industry.

Keywords

Main Subjects

A.M. Best. (2018). Best’s Capital Adequacy Ratio (BCAR) Methodology. Retrieved June 19, 2025, from https://www3.ambest.com/amby/bestspdfs/BCAR_Methodology.pdf
Baranoff, E. G., & Sager, T. W. (2002). The relations among asset risk, product risk, and capital in the life insurance industry. Journal of Banking & Finance, 26(6), 1181–1197.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(01)00166-2
Beneish, M. D. (1999). The detection of earnings manipulation. Financial Analysts Journal, 55(5), 24-36. The Detection of Earnings Manipulation: Financial Analysts Journal: Vol 55, No 5
Browne, M. J., & Hoyt, R. E. (1995). Economic and market predictors of insolvencies in the U.S. property–liability insurance industry. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 62(2), 309–327.
https://doi.org/10.2307/253794
Chen, R., & Wong, K. A. (2004). The determinants of financial health of Asian insurance companies. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 71(3), 469–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-4367.2004.00099.x
Cummins, J. D., & Weiss, M. A. (2014). Systemic risk and the U.S. insurance sector. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 81(3), 489–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.12039
Das, U. S., Podpiera, R., & Davies, N. (2003). Insurance and Issues in Financial Soundness, IMF Working Paper WP/03/138. International MonetaryFund. https://ideas.repec.org/p/imf/imfwpa/2003-138.html
EIOPA. (2014). Guidelines on the System of Governance under Solvency II. European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority. Retrieved May 21, 2025, from
https://www.eiopa.europa.eu/publications/guidelines-system-governance-under-solvency-ii_en
Eling, M., & Schmeiser, H. (2010). Insurance and the credit crisis: Impact and ten consequences for risk management and supervision. Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 35, 9–34.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/gpp.2009.39
Eling, M., & Schmeiser, H. (2010). Insurance and the credit crisis: Impact and ten consequences for risk management and supervision. Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance – Issues and Practice, 35(1), 9–34. https://doi.org/10.1057/gpp.2009.39
European Union. (2009). Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (Solvency II). Retrieved May 21, 2025, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32009L0138
Experts, A., Bahrami-Nasab, A., & Mameshli, R. (2019). The role of earnings quality in identifying fraudulent financial reporting. Empirical Accounting Research, 8(3), 313-336. https://civilica.com/doc/872397/ [In Persian].
Gharekhani, M. (2025). Model for Evaluating the Financial Health of Insurance Institutions [Research report]. Central Insurance of the Islamic Republic of Iran. https://en.centinsur.ir/_douranportal/usersfiles/h.akhoundi_3202/documents/%DA%AF%D8%B2%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%B4%20%D9%BE%DA%98%D9%88%D9%87%D8%B4%DB%8C.pdf [In Persian].
Gharekhani, M., & Ghazanfari Nasrabad, M. (2015). Financial performance evaluation and ranking of selected Iranian banks using CAMEL rating system indicators and the SAW multi‑criteria decision‑making method. Journal of Monetary and Banking Management Development, 3(6), 1-25. https://civilica.com/doc/629234
Gharekhani, M., & Zain Saz, A. (2016). Regulatory intervention in the insurance market using forward-looking indicators: A case study of IRIS indicators [Conference presentation]. Twenty-third National Conference and Ninth International Conference on Insurance and Development. https://civilica.com/doc/825816/ [In Persian].
Gharekhani, M., Aghababaei, Z., & Miri Chimeh, S. A. (2014). Presenting a model for predicting the financial strength of insurance companies based on early warning indicators [Conference Presentation]. Twenty-ninth National Conference and Tenth International Conference on Insurance and Development. https://civilica.com/doc/1770260/  [In Persian].
Grace, M. F., Harrington, S. E., & Klein, R. W. (1998). Risk-based capital and solvency screening in property–liability insurance: Hypotheses and empirical tests. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 65(2), 213–243. https://doi.org/10.2307/253534
IAIS. (2019). Insurance Core Principles: Standards, Guidance and Assessment Methodology. International Association of Insurance Supervisors. Retrieved May 21, 2025, from https://www.iaisweb.org/page/supervisory-material/insurance-core-principles-and-methodology/
IMF. (2006). Financial Soundness Indicators: Compilation Guide. International Monetary Fund.
https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fsi/guide/2006/
IMF. (2019). Financial Soundness Indicators: Compilation Guide 2019. International Monetary Fund. Retrieved May 18, 2025, from https://data.imf.org/?sk=51B055FA-81CD-47B9-9992-099D89E37E6E
Kucera, J. (2006). Market Analysis (IAIS Training Module 11). International Association of Insurance Supervisors. Retrieved May 21, 2025, from https://www.iaisweb.org/page/training-and-events/iais-training-modules
NAIC. (2012). IRIS Ratios: A Tool for Financial Analysis. National Association of Insurance Commissioners. https://content.naic.org/sites/default/files/publication-ipr-zu-iris-ratios-manual.pdf
NAIC. (2018). Risk-Based Capital (RBC) for Insurers: Overview and Methodology. National Association of Insurance Commissioners. https://content.naic.org/sites/default/files/publication-ipr-zu-rbc-overview.pdf
Pasiouras, F., & Gaganis, C. (2013). Regulations and soundness of insurance firms: International evidence. Journal of Business Research, 66(5), 632–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.09.023
Peykarjou, K., Haghverdilou, M., & Zomorodian, G. (2022). Introducing early warning system for solvency of Iranian insurance companies, using logit panel data method. Financial Management Strategy10(3), 187-202. https://doi.org/10.22051/jfm.2020.33318.2422 [In Persian].
Pottier, S. W., & Sommer, D. W. (1999). Property–liability insurer financial strength ratings: Differences across rating agencies. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 66(4), 621–642.
https://doi.org/10.2307/253867
Seddighi, R., Shekarkhah, J., Haghighi Kaffash, M., & Bahraminasab, A. (2014). Financial competence model of insurance companies using Fuzzy Delphi approach and structural equations. Journal of Econometric Modeling, 9(3), 169-209. https://jem.semnan.ac.ir/article_8717.html?lang=en [In Persian].
Shiu, Y. (2004). Determinants of United Kingdom general insurance company performance. British Actuarial Journal, 10(5), 1079–1110. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357321700002968
Thorburn, C. (2006). Non-life Insurance Ratios: An Introduction (IAIS Training Module 12B). International Association of Insurance Supervisors. Retrieved May 21, 2025, from  https://www.iaisweb.org/page/training-and-events/iais-training-modules

Letters to Editor


IJIR Journal welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in IJIR should be sent to the editorial office of IJIR within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.

[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.
CAPTCHA Image