Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

1 Professor, Department of Business Management, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Business Management, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

3 PhD Student, Department of Business Management, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sustainable business model innovation is a widely studied concept in management, sustainability, and innovation literature. Although extensively researched, business models have not fully adapted themselves to the technological, sustainability, and post-pandemic era. A critical future challenge for Iran is the financial instability of pension funds and social insurance organizations, with the crisis approaching a critical stage. Designing innovative sustainable business models for these organizations could offer an efficient solution. This study aims to identify factors influencing sustainable business model innovation, using a case study method focused on Iran’s Social Security Organization, and is the first such study of this organization. The research questions are: 1. What are the factors affecting sustainable business model innovation for the Social Security Organization, and how can they be classified? 2- What are the drivers and consequences affecting the implementation of sustainable business model innovation for the Social Security Organization, and how can they be classified? 3- What is the importance of each component of the sustainable business model innovation for the Social Security Organization across the three parts: antecedents, business model, and consequences?
METHODS: A single case study was conducted on Iran’s Social Security Organization. Data were collected through documentation and archival records (62 documents), interviews (23 interviews), and participant observation until theoretical saturation was achieved. The level of support for each component and their rankings was determined using the Shannon entropy method. Cohen’s kappa coefficient was used to assess the reliability of the coding process.
 FINDINGS: The research findings were analyzed and categorized using MAXQDA software. A total of 63 components and 279 codes were identified, relating to the characteristics of sustainable business model innovation for the Social Security Organization, across three levels: antecedents, sustainable business model innovation, and consequences. For the first research question, the sustainable business model innovation for the Social Security Organization comprised 183 codes, classified into 38 components and six categories. For the second research question, the drivers consisted of 67 codes, classified into 18 components and two categories. The consequences comprised 29 codes, classified into 7 components and three categories. For the third research question, the importance of each component was determined using the Shannon entropy method. Among the antecedents, dynamic capabilities ranked first, followed by government and macroeconomic components in second and third places, respectively. Within the business model, the innovation component—focused on increasing premium collection (compulsory and non-compulsory premiums, statutory audits) and reducing liability costs (short-term, long-term, and treatment)—ranked first. The knowledge and actuarial components, human resources, and insurance services (based on actuarial calculations) ranked second to fourth, respectively. Treatment services (considering the Organization’s service showcase, mass production, procurement of quality treatment services for beneficiaries, and cost-reduction methods) and other governance elements ranked fourth and fifth, respectively. Among the consequences, competitive advantage and market components ranked first, followed by:) community development (education, health, economic growth, and livelihoods) and social security components in second and third places, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Drawing on the sustainable business model framework (Bocken et al., 2018), this study introduces a novel model of antecedents, sustainable business model innovation, and consequences. The model includes antecedents (internal and external), the business model (divided into four subsections: value creation, value proposition, value exploitation, and value delivery), and consequences (economic, social, and environmental). This model can serve as a practical guide for managers of pension funds and social insurance organizations and policymakers in welfare and social security. The study also contributes to practical innovation and sustainable business model innovation in the service sector. To achieve sustainable business model innovation, the Social Security Organization should keep pace with new business trends (e.g., teleworking, freelancing, sharing economy) and simplify complex processes. Digitalizing services, including developing self-service applications and reducing in-person visits, is essential to improve beneficiary experiences. Operational transparency, through regular and online reports, strengthens public trust and social capital. Combating insurance fraud using artificial intelligence, data mining, and inter-agency collaboration conserves organizational resources. Marketing non-compulsory insurance expands coverage by strategically targeting new markets and modifying plans. An active role in discourse, lobbying, and legislation is crucial to maintaining the Organization’s independence and financial sustainability. Using artificial intelligence and digital capabilities to identify insured people and optimize inspections while increasing efficiency. Reducing bureaucracy, outsourcing non-core tasks, and reforming meritocratic appointments will enhance organizational innovation and agility.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Achterberg, E., Hinfelaar, J., & Bocken, N. (2016). Master Circular Business Models with with The the Value Hill [External report]. Circle Economy. https://research.tudelft.nl/en/publications/master-circular-business-models-with-the-value-hill
Akçayır, G., & Akçayır, M. (2016). Research trends in social network sites’ educational use: A review of publications in all SSCI journals to 2015. Review of Education, 4(3), 293-319. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3075
Akhavan Behbahani, A. (2017). Review of the Status of the Social Security Organization and the Need for Fundamental Reforms in it (Causes and Required Actions) [Report, No. 15569]. Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly. Retrieved October 13, 2024, from  https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/report/show/1037313 [In Persian].
Andersson, S., Svensson, G., Molina‐Castillo, F. J., Otero‐Neira, C., Lindgren, J., Karlsson, N. P., & Laurell, H. (2022). Sustainable development—Direct and indirect effects between economic, social, and environmental dimensions in business practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(5), 1158-1172. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2261
Bashir, M., Alfalih, A., & Pradhan, S. (2022). Sustainable business model innovation: Scale development, validation and proof of performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(4), 100243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100243
Bocken, N. M. P., Rana, P., & Short, S. W. (2015). Value mapping for sustainable business thinking. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 32(1), 67-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2014.1000399
Bocken, N. M., & Geradts, T. H. (2020). Barriers and drivers to sustainable business model innovation: Organization design and dynamic capabilities. Long range planning, 53(4), 101950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.101950
Bocken, N. M., Schuit, C. S., & Kraaijenhagen, C. (2018). Experimenting with a circular business model: Lessons from eight cases. Environmental innovation and societal transitions, 28, 79-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.02.001
Bocken, N. M., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039
Bocken, N., Boons, F., & Baldassarre, B. (2019). Sustainable business model experimentation by understanding ecologies of business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 1498-1512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.159
Breuer, H., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2017). Values-based network and business model innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 21(03), 1750028. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919617500281
Bruni, A., Magno, F., & Cassia, F. (2025). Future-oriented trajectories of business model innovation for agri-food SMEs. EuroMed Journal of Business, 20(5), 190-212. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-10-2024-0282
Chen, A., Li, L., & Shahid, W. (2024). Digital transformation as the driving force for sustainable business performance: A moderated mediation model of market-driven business model innovation and digital leadership capabilities. Heliyon, 10(8), e29509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29509
Chevrollier, N., Argyrou, A., Ainiwaer, N., & Nijhof, A. (2023). On the encroachment of sustainable value propositions: Business model innovation for impact. Journal of Cleaner Production, 382, 135341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135341
Ciasullo, M. V., Castellani, P., Rossato, C., & Troisi, O. (2019). Sustainable business model innovation. “Progetto Quid” as an exploratory case study. Sinergie Italian Journal of Management, 37(2), 213-237. https://doi.org/10.7433/s109.2019.11
Codini, A. P., Abbate, T., & Petruzzelli, A. M. (2023). Business Model Innovation and exaptation: A new way of innovating in SMEs. Technovation, 119, 102548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102548
Colabi, A. M. (2020). Modeling factors affecting the sustainability of business model. Public Management Researches, 13(47), 111-134. https://doi.org/10.22111/jmr.2020.32518.4901 [In Persian].
Colabi, A. M., Yadollahi Farsi, J., & Azizi, M. (2021). Identifying and prioritizing key success factors of business model. Public Management Researches, 14(54), 61-84. https://doi.org/10.22111/jmr.2021.37610.5392 [In Persian].
Csutora, M., Harangozo, G., & Szigeti, C. (2022). Sustainable business models—Crisis and rebound based on Hungarian research experience. Resources, 11(12), 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources11120107
D'Amato, V., Di Lorenzo, E., Piscopo, G., Sibillo, M., & Trotta, A. (2024). Insurance business and social sustainability: A proposal. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 93, 101880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2024.101880
Delghandi, F., Montazer Attayi, R., Salami, M. and Azadi Ahmadabadi, G. (2024). Designing an efficient business model in information services (Case study: Behnashr Astan Quds Razavi). Library and Information Sciences, 26(3), 63-87. Retrieved October 13, 2024, from https://elmnet.ir/doc/2751691-81751 [In Persian].
Denzin, N. K. (2017). Critical qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(1), 8-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800416681864
Di Tullio, P., Rea, M. A., Valentinetti, D., & La Torre, M. (2021). Toward performance measurement systems based on business models. Management Control, (1, Special issue), 97-122. https://www.torrossa.com/it/resources/an/4877442
Eling, M. (2024). Is the insurance industry sustainable? Journal of Risk Finance, 25(4), 684–703, https://doi.org/10.1108/JRF-12-2023-0314
Freudenreich, B., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Schaltegger, S. (2020). A stakeholder theory perspective on business models: Value creation for sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 166(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04112-z
Geissdoerfer, M., Vladimirova, D., & Evans, S. (2018). Sustainable business model innovation: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 401-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.240
Giang, H. T. T., & Dung, L. T. (2025). Sharing economy and retailer sustainable performance: The mechanisms via business model innovation and digital capabilities. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 14, Article number 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-025-00492-x
Habibi, A., & Jalalnia, R. (2022). Phenomenology. Naroon Publications. https://parsmodir.com/book/phenomenology-book [In Persian].
Haftor, D. M., & Costa, R. C. (2023). Five dimensions of business model innovation: A multi-case exploration of industrial incumbent firm’s business model transformations. Journal of Business Research, 154, 113352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113352
Iran Future Studies 1397. (2018). Tehran: Ayandeban Research Group. Retrieved October 17, 2025, from http://www.ayandeban.ir/iran1397 [In Persian].
Joyce, A., & Paquin, R. L. (2016). The triple layered business model canvas: A tool to design more sustainable business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 1474-1486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.067
Karlsson, N. (2019). Doing Well by Doing Good: The Business Model Innovation Process for Sustainability in Farm-Based Biogas Production [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Halmstad University Press. https://www.dissertations.se/dissertation/c1d6063231
Khovrak, I. (2020). ESG-driven approach to managing insurance companies’ sustainable development. Insurance Markets and Companies, 11(1), 42-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ins.11(1).2020.05
Kohn, L. T. (1997). Methods in case study analysis (Technical Publication No. 2). Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change. http://www.hschange.org/CONTENT/158/158.pdf
Kurek, J., Brandli, L. L., Leite Frandoloso, M. A., Lange Salvia, A., & Mazutti, J. (2023). Sustainable business models innovation and design thinking: A bibliometric analysis and systematic review of literature. Sustainability, 15(2), 988. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15020988.
Le, T. T., & Ikram, M. (2022). Do sustainability innovation and firm competitiveness help improve firm performance? Evidence from the SME sector in vietnam. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 29, 588-599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.11.008
Levänen, J., Hossain, M., & Wierenga, M. (2022). Frugal innovation in the midst of societal and operational pressures. Journal of Cleaner Production, 347, 131308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131308
Lot, G., & Haegeli, J. (2021). More Risk: The Changing Nature of P&C Insurance Opportunities to 2040. [Research report]. Sigma Re Institute .https://www.swissre.com/dam/jcr:5b5c9666-8faf-4ee2-9080-fba57c442702/virtual-rvs-%202021-pc-insurance%20opportunities.pdf
Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Dembek, K. (2017). Sustainable business model research and practice: Emerging field or passing fancy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 1668-1678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.093
Molaei, M. M. (2018). Futures Studies of Iran in 1397 (2018-2019). Ayandeban Research Group. http://www.ayandeban.ir/iran1397 [In Persian].
Nimfa, D. T., Uzir, M. U. H., Maimako, L. N., Eneizan, B., Latiff, A. S. A., & Wahab, S. A. (2021). The impact of innovation competitive advantage on product quality for sustainable growth among SMEs: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Business Science & Applied Management, 16(3), 39-62. https://hdl.handle.net/10419/261658
Nosratabadi, S., Pinter, G., Mosavi, A., & Semperger, S. (2020). Sustainable banking; Evaluation of the European business models. Sustainability, 12(6), 2314. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062314
Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers (Vol. 1). John Wiley & Sons. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Business+Model+Generation%3A+A+Handbook+for+Visionaries%2C+Game+Changers%2C+and+Challengers-p-9780470876411
Pan, L., Xu, Z., & Skare, M. (2023). Sustainable business model innovation literature: A bibliometrics analysis. Review of Managerial Science, 17, 757-785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00548-2
Pepin, M., Tremblay, M., Audebrand, L. K., & Chassé, S. (2024). The responsible business model canvas: Designing and assessing a sustainable business modeling tool for students and start-up entrepreneurs. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 25(3), 514-538. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-01-2023-0008
Rotondo, F., Corsi, K., & Giovanelli, L. (2019). The social side of sustainable business models: An explorative analysis of the low-cost airline industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 225, 806-819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.345
Sabatier, V., Medah, I., Augsdorfer, P., & Maduekwe, A. (2017). Social business model design and implementation in developing countries: Learning from an affordable medicine developed in Burkina Faso. Journal of Management Development, 36(1), 48-57. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-03-2015-0041
Shakeel, J., Mardani, A., Chofreh, A. G., Goni, F. A., & Klemeš, J. J. (2020). Anatomy of sustainable business model innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 261, 121201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121201
Sjödin, D., Parida, V., Jovanovic, M., & Visnjic, I. (2020). Value creation and value capture alignment in business model innovation: A process view on outcome‐based business models. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 37(2), 158-183. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12516
Snihur, Y., & Bocken, N. (2022). A call for action: The impact of business model innovation on business ecosystems, society and planet. Long Range Planning, 55(6) 102182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2022.102182
Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., Prins, F. J., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2006). Content analysis: What are they talking about? Computers & Education, 46(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.002
Taghavi, M. H., Akhavan, P., Ahmadi, R., & Bonyadi Naeini, A. (2022). Identifying key components in implementation of Internet of Energy (IoE) in Iran with a combined approach of meta-synthesis and structural analysis: A systematic review. Sustainability, 14(20), 13180. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013180
Utaminingsih, A., Widowati, S. Y., & Witjaksono, E. H. (2024). Sustainable business model innovation: External and internal factors on SMEs. International Journal of Innovation Science, 16(1), 95-113. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-04-2022-0061
Velter, M. G. E., Bitzer, V., Bocken, N. M. P., & Kemp, R. (2020). Sustainable business model innovation: The role of boundary work for multi-stakeholder alignment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, 119497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119497
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Vol. 5, 6th ed.). Sage. https://swbplus.bsz-bw.de/bsz1009406280inh.htm
Yip, A. W., & Bocken, N. M. P. (2018). Sustainable business model archetypes for the banking industry. Journal of cleaner production, 174, 150-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.190
Yun, J. J., Won, D., Park, K., Jeong, E., & Zhao, X. (2019). The role of a business model in market growth: The difference between the converted industry and the emerging industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 534-562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.04.024
Zhang, X., Chu, Z., Ren, L., & Xing, J. (2023). Open innovation and sustainable competitive advantage: The role of organizational learning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 186, 122114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122114

Letters to Editor


IJIR Journal welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in IJIR should be sent to the editorial office of IJIR within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.

[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.
CAPTCHA Image