Document Type : Original Research Paper

Author

Assistant Professor, Department of Personal Insurance, Insurance Research Center, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: One of the strategies to increase the penetration rate in the country's insurance industry is to create diversity in life insurance products. In this context, one of the expanding life insurance products is joint life insurance, which can cover two individuals under a single policy in two scenarios: upon the first death and upon the second death or the last survivor. Joint life insurance policies are designed to cover the risk of death for couples or business partners in the event of one spouse’s death. In fact, these types of life insurance policies cover two lives, but the premium collected from the policyholder is approximately equivalent to the premium of a single life insurance policy. Based on the lower premium of joint life insurance compared to two individual life insurance policies, this policy will be economically beneficial for young couples. To purchase joint life insurance policies or two individual life insurance policies, many factors should be considered, including the family budget, the expected coverage amount, and the future of the spouse or children. Although two individual life insurance policies offer more coverage, paying two premiums in a family requires a high income. Therefore, for couples who do not have an ideal economic situation, it is recommended to use joint life insurance policies. This paper aims to introduce joint life insurance as a product that has growth potential in the life insurance industry in Iran, focusing on the design of new products and calculating premiums and joint death probabilities based on the technical foundations of Regulation 107 of the Supreme Insurance Council.
METHODS: In this study, actuarial calculations and net premium rates for four classic types of joint life insurance have been examined. Based on this analysis, joint death probabilities have been extracted using the TD88-90 table and the national life table of Iran (ILT1400) and compared accordingly. Also, the impact of life table on the revenue and profit of insurance company has been investigated.
FINDINGS: The joint death probabilities using the national life table of Iran are significantly lower. Additionally, among the four classic types of joint life insurance, term joint life insurance has the lowest premium rates. In joint life insurance policies, such as whole life and joint endowment insurance, premiums increase with age due to the rising probability of death. However, in joint pure endowment life insurance policies, premiums decrease with age because, as individuals grow older, their probability of death increases while their probability of survival decreases. Therefore, lower premiums should be charged for these age groups in pure endowment life insurance policies. Next, we examined the impact of premium reduction on the revenue of an insurance company. For this purpose, an analytical model was used, which includes simulating various premium scenarios and calculating their associated financial results. First, it is assumed that there is a five-year joint term life insurance policy with annual premium payments, and 1000 customers have purchased this policy. To identify the impact of premium reduction, two different premium rates were considered: the rate derived from the local life table and the rate derived from the life table of France. Additionally, to calculate revenue and profit, we used stepped technical interest rates in accordance with Regulation 107 of the Supreme Insurance Council throughout the policy term, which are determined separately for each year. These rates are as follows: 16% for the first two years, 13% for the next two years, and 10% for the final year in the 5-year policy. To calculate revenue, we first converted all received premium funds to present value, considering the relevant interest rates. This helps us understand how received premiums are affected by different interest rates and what their impact on the company's final revenue will be. Then, using established formulas, the company's revenue and profit were calculated. In these calculations, the loss ratio (approximately 49% based on the statistical yearbook of the insurance industry) and operational costs (20%) were also taken into account to observe more accurate results.
CONCLUSION: Joint life insurance leads to a reduction in premium amounts, making it more economical compared to purchasing two separate individual life insurance policies for individuals. In the context of developing this product, the following recommendations may be implemented by the insurance industry: offering non-savings joint life insurance policies to diversify life insurance products, approving the general conditions for non-savings joint life insurance policies, and applying discounts to encourage more individuals to purchase joint life insurance.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Abonongo, J., & Luguterah, A. (2016). Actuarial analysis of single life status and multiple life statuses. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(3), 123-131. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160503.17
Bilikova, M., & Luffrum, G. (2005). A modern approach to modeling insurances on two lives. Journal of Actuarial Practice, 12, 127-136. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1020&context=joap
Chen, L. (2010). Analysis of Joint Life Insurance with Stochastic Interest Rates [Unpublished master dissertation]. Simon Fraser University. https://summit.sfu.ca/item/11537
Denuit, M., Dhaene, C., Le Bailly De Tilleghem, C., & Teghem, S. (2001). Measuring the impact of a dependence among insured life lengths. Belgian Actuarial Bulletin, 1(1), 18-39. https://hdl.handle.net/11245/1.184531
Dickson, D. C. M., Hardy, M. R., & Waters, H. R. (2019). Actuarial Mathematics for Life Contingent Risks (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.‏ https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108784184
Frank, M. J. (1979). On the simultaneous associativity of  and . Aequationes Mathematicae, 19, 194-226.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02189866
Frees, E. W., Carriere, J., & Valdez, E. (1996). Annuity valuation with dependent mortality. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 63(2), 229-261.‏ https://doi.org/10.2307/253744
Ghanbarzadeh, M. (2020). Examination and Evaluation of Joint Life Insurance and its Expansion in Iran [Research Project]. Insurance Research Center, Personal Insurance Research Department. https://www.irc.ac.ir/_douranportal/documents/tables/zendegi/irc-life.pdf  [In Persian].
Henshaw, K., Koffi, C. H. A., Menoukeu Pamen, O., & Zeineddine, R. (2025). On the valuation of life insurance policies for dependent coupled lives. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2025(8), 768–803. https://doi.org/10.1080/03461238.2025.2467635
Hougaard, P. (2000). Analysis of Multivariate Survival Data. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1304-8
Hürlimann, W. (2009). Actuarial Analysis of the Multiple Life Endowment Insurance Contract [Conference presentation]. 3rd IAA Life Colloquium, Munich, Germany. https://actuaries.org/app/uploads/2025/07/LIFE_Huerlimann_Products_Paper_Munich2009.pdf
Jagger, C., & Sutton, C. J. (1991). Death after marital bereavement‐is the risk increased. Statistics in Medicine, 10(3), 395-404.‏ https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780100311
Koosheshi, M. (2018). Life Tables of Iran for the Year 2016 Based on Death Registration Statistics in Iran [Research report]. Insurance Research Center. https://www.irc.ac.ir/en-US/Irc/4946/Articles/view/14643/24/ [In Persian].
Lee, I., Lee, H., & Kim, H. T. (2014). Analysis of reserves in multiple life insurance using copula. Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods, 21(1), 23-43. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264168328_Analysis_of_Reserves_in_Multiple_Life_Insurance_using_Copula
Li, D. X. (1999). On default correlation: A copula function approach. The Journal of Fixed Income, 9(4), 43-54.
Miasary, S. D. (2022). Annual premium determination for joint life insurance with de moivre and gompertz’s mortality laws. Square: Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 4(2), 117-123. https://doi.org/10.21580/square.2022.4.2.13212
Nelsen, R. B. (2006). An Introduction to Copulas (2nd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28678-0
Norberg, R. (1989). Actuarial analysis of dependent lives. Bulletin of the Swiss Association of Actuaries, 2, 243-254. https://catalog.nlm.nih.gov/discovery/fulldisplay/alma9910427723406676/01NLM_INST:01NLM_INST
Ramadhan, M. A., Zainuddin, A. F., Pasaribu, U. S., & Sari, R. K. N. (2025). Joint-Life insurance premium model using Archimedean copula: The study of mortality in Indonesia. Journal of the Indonesian Mathematical Society, 31(1), 1783. https://doi.org/10.22342/jims.v31i1.1783
Spreeuw, J., & Wang, X. (2008). Modelling the short-term dependence between two remaining lifetimes. Cass Business School Discussion Paper, 2(3).‏ https://www.actuaries.org.uk/system/files/documents/pdf/Spreeuw_modelling.pdf
Statistical Yearbook of the Insurance Industry. (2023). Central Insurance of the Islamic Republic of Iran. https://www.centinsur.ir/fa-IR/Portal/5493/page/%D8%B3%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%85%D9%87-%D8%A2%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%B1%DB%8C-1402 [In Persian].
Sverdrup, E. (1965). Estimates and test procedures in connection with stochastic models for deaths, recoveries and transfers between different states of health. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 1965(3-4), 184-211.‏ https://doi.org/10.1080/03461238.1965.10405687
Tajobian, S., & Hassanzadeh, A. (2015). Markovian approach application in joint-life mortality modeling. Iranian Journal of Insurance Research, 4(2), 61-84. https://ijir.irc.ac.ir/article_11857.html?lang=en [In Persian].
Waters, H. (1984). An approach to the study of multiple state models. Journal of the Institute of Actuaries, 111(2), 363-374. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020268100041731
Youn, H., & Shemyakin, A. (2001). Pricing practices for joint last survivor insurance. Actuarial Research Clearing House, 1(2).‏ https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:45339065
Zhou, R., & Ji, M. (2021). Modelling mortality dependence: An application of dynamic vine copula. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 99, 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2021.03.022

Letters to Editor


IJIR Journal welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in IJIR should be sent to the editorial office of IJIR within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.

[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.
CAPTCHA Image